Arguments For Support Claims With Clear Reasons And...

Final Unit Plan Michael Bruce Hill July 6, 2015 Professor Tate EDU 501 Summary: To be able to write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. (Common Core) Writing Standards Text Types and Purposes 1. Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. a. Introduce claim(s), acknowledge and distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and organize the reasons and evidence logically. b. Support claim(s) with logical reasoning and relevant evidence, using accurate, credible sources and demonstrating an understanding of the topic or text. c. Use words, phrases, and clauses to create cohesion and clarify the relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. d. Establish and maintain a formal style. e. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented. (Common Core) Michael Bruce Hill Unwrapping My Plan for 8th Grade ELA Students Objective: To be able to write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. Prerequisite Skills 1. Introduce opposing claims and their reasons logically. 2. Support claims with relevant evidence using credible sources. 3. Clarify relations between claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. 4. Use a formal style. 5. Conclude in a way that logically follows from the premises. Key Terms (vocabulary) Definition Student-friendlyShow MoreRelatedOutline And Objective Of A Persuasive Text1284 Words   |  6 Pagessupporting evidence, reasons, and a claim in a persuasive text is a lot like building a puzzle. Without the outside border, the inside pieces won’t seem complete and without the inside pieces, you have an empty picture. Evidence and reasoning are the two basic pieces of your persuasive letter. Without these, you’ll simply have a frame—your claim—without information to complete the argument. Explaining how things connect for your reader is one of the most important ways to strengthen your argument. TodayRead MoreEvaluation Of A Good Argument1394 Words   |  6 Pages7.3 – Neutralization of the fallacy: In paragraph 4 the author has violated the sufficiency criterion of a good argument. The author has violates the sufficiency criteria by committing the fallacy of false analogy. In paragraph 4 the author states, â€Å"In the mid 1940s – before publicly funded healthcare – my grand parents sold their car to pay the hospital bill related to my father’s birth, so â€Å"purchasing† the birth of a child is nothing new.† This is a wrong analogy. Just because you pay for hospitalRead Morenm,n. On the other hand the main dissimilarity of those two essays is authors view towards the society. Their ideas are very helpful for the development of our society.1747 Words   |  7 PagesEvaluation of an Argument through Analysis – In this assignment, you are required to show your abilities to summarize and evaluate the effectiveness of an argument, based on your analysis of it. Thus far in the course, we have explored the ways in which we read and analyze an argumentative text critically. Critical analysis of a text requires us to look for what the author claims (the main idea/thesis) and to closely examine how the author supports the claim (via subsidiary claims and evidence). It alsoRead MoreWhen Is The Last Time You Fought With Someone For Hours1552 Words   |  7 PagesArgumentation takes place all around the world in messages designed to influence other beliefs and behaviors. A rational argument adapts to the audience in an ethical manner, fulfills the requirements of presumption and burden of proof and effectively supports the claims while avoiding common fallacies. Audience analysis is one of the most important aspects of creating a respectable argument. Since the purpose at stake is to influence thought and behavior, it is essential for the advocate to adapt theirRead MoreCritical Analysis - Cognitive Dissonance, Media Illiteracy and Public Opinion on News Media’1546 Words   |  7 Pagesnewspapers and television news and shows why a lot of the quantitative research taken over the past several decades is in fact invalid. The main purpose of this article is to compare and contrast newspaper and television news, and investigate the reasons why one source is more credible and reliable than the other. He also discusses the decline in the audiences of both. Context – Many other scholars have cited Claussen as to why he believes people choose TV news over newspaper is because ‘itRead MoreEssay about A Rhetorical Perspective on the Issue of WikiLeaks1712 Words   |  7 Pagesreleased by the website will endanger anyone. The only people who will be negatively affected, Greenhut says, would be the government officials whose â€Å"hypocrisy and corruption† would be shamefully exposed (Greenhut 1.) In the opposite side of the argument stands S.E. Cupp. In an article, she says that WikiLeaks and its proponents are jeopardizing innocent life by recklessly releasing unfiltered information for the entire world to access. She argues that by irresponsibly posting classified informationRead MoreThe Fashion Choices People Make Should Not Define Who They Are1288 Words   |  6 Pagesdetermine whether they are good or bad. I chose this argument topic because it involves my major in fashion and also an issue for which I can relate. The study of fashion and sociology can relate in some ways, therefore, this would be an interesting argumentative research topic. The first key point that I can use in my essay would be that children, especially teenagers, are judge by their peers based on their fashion choices. This claim supports my argument by showing that teenagers that are judged harshlyRead MoreAnalysis Of Protecting Freedom Of Expression On The Campus1066 Words   |  5 Pagesargues that rather than prohibiting the expression of offensive speech, it would be better to ignore it. He fails to support his claim by dismissing the emotional discomfort that people might find themselves in, in response to someone’s offensive expressions, and by not being a credible source of information on the topic, but he successfully appeals to the reader by offering logical reasons as to why censorship is dangerous. Bok’s purpose is to inform the reader of the potential problems that could ariseRead MoreA Critical Evaluation Of Theological Background1108 Words   |  5 Pagesbecame Man† defends and explains the reasons for the Incarnat ion of Jesus Christ by offering a strong Christian perspective and leveraging biblical text. Strauss was a Bible teacher, author, and speaker. He claimed his message was â€Å"for plain people.† Wilbur Smith declared Strauss’ Revelation study was the most helpful volume of the twentieth century. The following review presents a critical evaluation of theological background, topical understating, argument construction, opposing viewpoints, topicRead MoreCritical Analysis of Deaths Waiting List Essay1094 Words   |  5 PagesS. She hopes to convince the reader that the only guarantee of getting a transplant is to skip the wait list and just buy one. Although Satel makes a good argument she seems very biased and provides biased evidence to support her claims. Satel claims that there is a problem with organ donations. In order to prove this she begins her argument by stating that the wait for a kidney in a big city, â€Å"is five to eight years and expected to double by 2010.†(2) Well, it is now 2012 and it still takes the